A cement factory is big Energy guzzler. Each component of the processing plant is equally critical. Small reduction in energy consumption can yield big commercial and environmental benefits.
Some of the aspects to ponder upon are:
Fuel:
|
|
Power Supply:
|
|
Operational Measures:
|
|
Air Compressor:
|
|
DG Sets Operation and Maintenance
|
|
Motors:
|
|
Transformer
|
|
Power Factor :
|
|
Lighting :
|
|
Energy at work
Thursday 25 April 2013
Relook at energy conservation in Cement Factory
Resurgence of Coal
Coal has been the first primary ‘Stocks’
energy source that found Industrial application. Power plants and metal
refineries were built on coal based energy source. It triggered and sustained
the industrial revolution till 1950s, when the oil arrived as a more
convenient, economical and less polluting. Even gas-dash of 1990s could not
displace Coal from the second position. This is essentially due to the fact
that there is abundance and widespread geographic availability of coal. The R/P
of coal is the best at 197 years.
At current consumption rates and with current technology and land-use
restrictions, the U.S. coal reserves would last well over 250 years.
US is hailed as Saudi Arabia of coal.
With improved technologies, estimated recoverable coal reserves, at
current consumption rates, are estimated to be sufficient for 500 years or
longer.
Both OECD
(Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) nations and the
upcoming non-OECD countries are replete with coal based installations.
Three
nations account for 60% of world coal use i.e. China, US and India. Energy
demand is growing rapidly in China and India and both nations get most of their
electricity from coal. The US Department of electricity projects that world
coal consumption will rise by 60% from 2010 through 2030 and that China and
India will account for nearly three-fourths of the increase.
An
exponential increase in world demand for energy, geopolitical development,
growing concern on imports and security of supply, uneconomical non-fossil
energy sources, indecision about nuclear power are all factors which are
contributing to the resurgence of coal.
Coal is considered
attractive again because its prices are low and stable relative to those of petroleum
and natural gas, which swing unpredictably.
But some
reviewers believe that the current haste has more to do with fear and hunger to
garner as much energy resources as possible. Coal use, primarily for the
generation of electricity, now accounts for roughly 20 percent of global GHG
emissions. With the ghost of climate change looming even larger in the public
consciousness, utilities are anticipating that the time will soon come when regulators
will slap a limit on carbon emissions from electric power generators and
perhaps other industrial sources, and that the more coal-fired capacity the
producers build before that day of reckoning, the higher their share of the
total cap will be.
This
renaissance is taking place in many countries, but by far the most important
driver is escalating demand for coal in China, accompanied by growth in India
and by continued strong demand in the USA.
Coal is
normally one of the most economic ways to generate electricity. But, with a
cost of CO2 – either direct or indirect – at $60/ton, coal would be more expensive
than the natural gas, nuclear and wind power.
There is
enough federal spend on research and technology development for cleaner-burning coal (called integrated gasification
combined cycle, or IGCC), that can be equipped to capture and sequester carbon.
IGCC, mentioned above, is the least polluting coal burning
technology being developed today The
advantages of IGCC over pulverized coal technology are that it is more
efficient (using less coal to produce each kilowatthour of electricity), uses
much less water, and emits much less SO2, particulates, and mercury.
Most important, carbon capture can be integrated into an IGCC plant much more easily
and cheaply than into a pulverized coal plant. Jana Milford, a senior scientist
with the U.S. NGO Environmental Defense, says that IGCC combined with
sequestration can cut CO2 emissions
by 90 percent compared with conventional plants.
Demand
for coal will peak by 2025 and begin a gradual decline, in part because of
emerging policies that will seek to curb emissions by imposing a cost on higher
carbon fuels. Use of renewable energies and nuclear power will grow
significantly. By 2040, less than 30% of the world’s electricity will be
generated from Coal, down from about 40% today.
It is very clear that
coal will resurge as an essential contributor to the world’s primary energy
supply for a decade to come. Unless there are discoveries of oil or gas thate
enhances R/P ratio by double digits, or radical technology improvement in the
use of renewable energy sources, it seems that the Stock-driven choice in the
twenty-first century could continue to be coal and nuclear power. Consumption
of coal will expand, although more slowly than that of other fuels. But, the coal usage will decline after 2025,
since many of the renewable energy sources and Nuclear energy will also become
sustainable.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)